Found 1 log file for this date.
e.s.lamarre@cerchio project/mir/log/11243396
Subject consistently demonstrating levels of emotional expression considered dangerous to the project. Threat level remains CODE YELLOW but overall project validity, integrity at high risk. Suggested course of action to monitor closely for the time being. Further course(s) of action to be discussed at earliest opportunity, CONFIDENTIALLY. Leaks below top level will be penalised to highest extent.
Found 10 emails for this date.
---
From: d.gresye@cerchio.co.at.el
To:[list]
Damn. What do we do now? Scrap, start again?
---
From: e.cail@cerchio.co.at.el
To:[list]
Gods' sake, no! Have we really lost all sense of ethical responsibility here? I'm sorry but this has been on my mind since there started being noises about her having emotions and everything just carries on like normal here. I'm finding it really hard to feel comfortable with the direction you're taking the project in.
Please advise.
---
From: d.gresye@cerchio.co.at.el
To:[list]
> I'm finding it really hard to feel comfortable with the direction you're taking the project in.
Then, with all respect, get the hell out.
Ethical responsibility? Don't you want to think about our ethical responsibility to EVERYONE IN THE WORLD? More powerful β-Reyvateil than Shurelia. If that thing turns on us we're dead.
I'd like to see you take ethical responsibility for that one when the news cameras are pointing in your face, or more likely, at your wife's dead body.
---
From: e.cail@cerchio.co.at.el
To:[list]
> If that thing turns on us we're dead.
If we start treating her like a person she won't have a reason to turn on us.
> I'd like to see you take ethical responsibility for that one[...]
Thanks for the warning. For the record, I find your conduct with me today to be highly inappropriate. Let's keep to practical matters.
---
From: e.s.lamarre@cerchio.co.at.al
To:[list]
> If we start treating her like a person
Not what this project is about. We're not babysitters. She's a military-grade weapon or she's nothing.
Call for responses, _please_. Sane ones. Thank you. Please tag keep/discard as appropriate.
---
From: a.kyhar@cerchio.co.at.al
To:[list]
Keep. We've sunk far too much money, time and energy into this project to just scrap it.
Monitor her closely, keep the area she's in SECURE, work on a way to fix whatever glitched up. I think she's salvageable, just needs the right code hacked back into her head, so to speak.
---
From: r.zzhon@cerchio.co.at.el
To:[list]
Keep. Give her a blog, we'll see how she's developing and most importantly _what_. At the very least we'll get something useful out of seeing how something like her thinks.
If it turns out she's not weapons-grade, sure, we might need to get rid, but she's not doing any harm now, so let's learn while we can.
---
From: a.kyhar@cerchio.co.at.al
To:[list]
> Give her a blog, we'll see how she's developing and most importantly _what_.
Seconded. Good plan.
---
From: d.gresye@cerchio.co.at.el
To:[list]
Unpopular vote here, but discard. I wasn't decided before but having this discussion has made up my mind. I'm frankly quite uncomfortable with having it be alive. I always worried what would happen if this went down and now it has. I think we should have had a better contingency plan in the first place, to be honest.
Let's get this over with and go back to something more real, something that isn't going to keep me up at nights waiting for the freaking apocalypse.
---
From: e.cail@cerchio.co.at.el
To:[list]
Keep, but you already know my feelings.
> I always worried what would happen if this went down[.]
Agreed. Though you clearly didn't have the same reasons I did.
---
Friday, 26 September 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment